Call free on
1300 575 394
Get a quote

Redundancy – do you have to consult?

Do we have to consult with managers who have been selected for redundancy?
Return to previous page
Redundancy – do you have to consult?

Redundancy – do you have to consult?

14 July 2020

By Paul Munro

Do we have to consult with managers who have been selected for redundancy?

This question was recently sent to our Workplace Advice Line.

Q Due to the impact of COVID-19, we're restructuring and making several positions redundant, including some management roles. Our enterprise agreement contains a model clause regarding consultation for employees covered by the agreement, however there is nothing in our company policies and procedures regarding consultation with management staff.

Do we have to consult with employees who have been selected for redundancy if they are not covered by the agreement?

A The obligation on an employer to consult about redundancy only arises when a modern award or enterprise agreement applies to an employee and that award or agreement contains requirements to consult about redundancy.

However, while it isn't mandatory for an employer to consult with an award/agreement free employee, failure to implement a proper consultation procedure for all employees may still be taken into account by the Fair Work Commission when considering the fairness, or otherwise, of a dismissal. Failure to consult may trigger a general protections application if, for example, an employee claims the selection criteria used to identify which employee(s) to be made redundant was subjective or discriminatory.

Subjective criteria are open to abuse and could be used to target particular workers. Referring to factors such as “teamwork”, “know-how”, “initiative”, “integrity”, “trust”, “credibility”, etc. should be avoided. It seems the problem about subjective criteria is not so much the fact of their adoption, but the burden they impose on those that have to apply them.

In the case of discriminatory issues, an employer who, for example, uses an employee’s workers compensation status as a factor in determining whether he or she should be selected for redundancy has been determined by the Fair Work Commission as being unfair against the employee.

It should be noted that while there is a salary threshold in relation to unfair dismissal claims ($153,600 pa from 1 July, 2020), under general protections provisions there is no salary threshold which would prevent a dismissed award/agreement free employee from making an application under the Fair Work Act.

In the absence of a specific requirement to consult with award/agreement free employees, it is advisable for the employer to include the following consultation requirements:

  • notifying the employees who may be affected by the proposed changes
  • providing the employees with information about these changes and their expected effects
  • discussing steps taken to avoid and minimise negative effects on the employees
  • considering employees ideas or suggestions about the changes.

Award and agreement covered employees

In the case of employees covered by a modern award or an enterprise agreement, the failure to notify and consult with an employee in accordance with the applicable industrial instrument is considered by the Fair Work Commission to be a serious defect in the procedure relating to the dismissal of an employee whose position has become redundant.

This is reinforced by the Fair Work Act (s389(1)(b)), which states that a person’s dismissal was a case of ‘genuine redundancy’ if the employer has complied with any obligation in a modern award or enterprise agreement that applied to the employment to consult about the redundancy.

Under the Fair Work Act (s.389), a dismissal will be case of genuine redundancy if:
  • the employer no longer requires the employee’s job to be performed by anyone because of changes in the operational requirements of the employer’s enterprise, and
  • the employer complies with its consultation obligations under the relevant modern award or enterprise agreement, and
  • it is not reasonable to redeploy the employee in to the employer’s enterprise, or an enterprise of an associated entity of the employer.


In a matter before the Fair Work Commission, it determined that where consultation was highly unlikely to have negated the operational reasons for the dismissal or lead to any other substantive changes, the failure to consult prior to termination is not important if the employee had been dismissed in any event, even if timely consultation had occurred. See Maswan v Escada Textilvertrieb t/a Escada [2011] FWA 4239.

Workplace Advice Line

Got a question about HR management or employment law? Call our Workplace Advice Line on 1300 575 394.

Sign up to get the latest news and updates

Like what you’re hearing?

With plans available from just $58 per week, now is an excellent time to join Workplace Assured.